The following example illustrates the numerical part of a simple make-or-buy decision.
Example
The estimated costs of producing 6,000 units of a component are:
Per Unit | Total | |
Direct Material | $10 | $60,000 |
Direct Labor | 8 | 48,000 |
Applied Variable Factory Overhead | 9 | 54,000 |
Applied Fixed Factory Overhead | 12 | 72,000 |
$1.5 per direct labor dollar | ||
$39 | $234,000 |
The same component can be purchased from market at a price of $29 per unit. If the component is purchased from market, 25% of the fixed factory overhead will be saved.
Should the component be purchased from the market?
Solution
Per Unit | Total | |||
Make | Buy | Make | Buy | |
Purchase Price | $29 | $174,000 | ||
Direct Material | $10 | $60,000 | ||
Direct Labor | 8 | 48,000 | ||
Variable Overhead | 9 | 54,000 | ||
Relevant Fixed Overhead | 3 | 18,000 | ||
Total Relevant Costs | $30 | $29 | $180,000 | $174,000 |
Difference in Favor of Buying | $1 | $6,000 |
EXAMPLE
Here is a hypothetical example for coming to a make-or-buy decision. A reputable skateboard company is now manufacturing the heavy duty bearing that is utilized in its most liked line of skateboards. The business’ accounting section reports the following expenses for manufacturing 8000 units of the bearings internally every year.
Direct Materials | $6 | x | 8000 | = | $48,000 |
Direct Labor | $4 | x | 8000 | = | $32,000 |
Supervisor Salary | $3 | x | 8000 | = | $24,000 |
Variable Overhead | $1 | x | 8000 | = | $8,000 |
Allocated general overhead | $5 | x | 8000 | = | $40,000 |
Depreciation of special equipment | $2 | x | 8000 | = | $16,000 |
Total Expense | $21 | x | 8000 | = | $168,000 |
An external supplier offered to sell 8000 bearings to the skateboard company for only $19 per bearing. Should the business cease manufacturing the bearings internally or instead, purchase them from an external supplier? To arrive at a make-or-buy decision, the focus should, at all times, be on the relevant costs (the ones that differ between the alternatives). The expenses that differ between alternatives comprise the expenses that could be prevented by buying the bearings from an external supplier.
If the expenses that can be avoided by buying bearings from the external supplier amount to less than $19, the business must continue to manufacture its bearings and reject the external supplier’s offer. On the other hand, if the expenses that can be prevented by buying the bearings from the external supplier amount to more than $19, the external supplier’s offer should be accepted.
You can use the setup below to manage your applicable/avoidable expenses.
Total applicable/avoidable expense for Making 8000 units:
Direct Materials | $6 | x | 8000 | = | $48,000 |
Direct Labor | $4 | x | 8000 | = | $32,000 |
Supervisor Salary | $3 | x | 8000 | = | $24,000 |
Variable Overhead | $1 | x | 8000 | = | $8,000 |
Allocated general overhead | not | relevant | |||
Depreciation of special equipment | not | relevant | |||
Total Expense | $14 | x | 8000 | = | $112,000 |
Total expense for Buying 8000 Units:
Outside purchase expense | $19 | x | 8000 | = | $152,000 |
The difference of $40,000 supports continuing to make 8000 units.
Keep in mind that depreciation of special equipment is mentioned as one of the expenses for manufacturing the bearings internally. Owing to the fact that the equipment has already been bought, this depreciation is a sunken expense and is, therefore, not applicable. If the equipment could be utilized to create another product, this may be a relevant expense as well. Still, we suppose that the equipment has no salvage value and no other use.
In addition, the company is setting aside a part of its general operating expenses, for bearings. Any part of the general operating expenses that would be done away with if the bearings were bought instead of made would be pertinent in this analysis. However, the general operating expenses are possibly a common expense to all the company’s goods produced in the factory and which would continue without changes even if the bearings were bought from outside (is not relevant).
The variable cost (direct labor, direct material and variable overhead) can be prevented if the business does not make the bearing. In addition, we suppose that the supervisor’s salary can also be avoided. This is because at $40,000, it costs less to manufacture the bearings internally than to purchase them from an external supplier.
In conclusion, it may be said, the make-or-buy decision is a very important decision with respect to overall production strategy and the possible implications for asset levels, employment levels and key competencies. Business accounting may appear to be an easy set of equations mirroring the money that enters into a business and that which flows out from it. However, in reality, there are countless intricacies associated with the relationship between various kinds of income and costs. Complexity is particularly obvious in make-or-buy. Considering these aspects, the make-or-buy decision should be weighed with utmost care.
No comments:
Post a Comment