Wednesday, 18 April 2018

BUACC3714 - Balance Scorecard

This is interesting!

Balanced Scorecard Basics

The balanced scorecard (BSC) is a strategic planning and management system that organizations use to:
  • Communicate what they are trying to accomplish
  • Align the day-to-day work that everyone is doing with strategy
  • Prioritize projects, products, and services
  • Measure and monitor progress towards strategic targets

The system connects the dots between big picture strategy elements such as mission (our purpose), vision (what we aspire for), core values (what we believe in), strategic focus areas (themes, results and/or goals) and the more operational elements such as objectives (continuous improvement activities), measures (or key performance indicators, or KPIs, which track strategic performance), targets (our desired level of performance), and initiatives (projects that help you reach your targets).



Who Uses the Balanced Scorecard (BSC)?

BSCs are used extensively in business and industry, government, and nonprofit organizations worldwide. Gartner Group suggests that over 50% of large US firms have adopted the BSC. More than half of major companies in the US, Europe, and Asia are using the BSC, with use growing in those areas as well as in the Middle East and Africa. A recent global study by Bain & Co listed balanced scorecard fifth on its top ten most widely used management tools around the world, a list that includes closely-related strategic planning at number one. BSC has also been selected by the editors of Harvard Business Review as one of the most influential business ideas of the past 75 years.

BSC Terminology: Perspectives

The BSC suggests that we view the organization from four perspectives, and to develop objectives, measures (KPIs), targets, and initiatives (actions) relative to each of these points of view: 
  • Financial: often renamed Stewardship or other more appropriate name in the public sector, this perspective views organizational financial performance and the use of financial resources
  • Customer/Stakeholder: this perspective views organizational performance from the point of view the customer or other key stakeholders that the organization is designed to serve
  • Internal Process: views organizational performance through the lenses of the quality and efficiency related to our product or services or other key business processes
  • Organizational Capacity (originally called Learning and Growth): views organizational performance through the lenses of human capital, infrastructure, technology, culture and other capacities that are key to breakthrough performance


BSC Terminology: Strategic Objectives

Strategic Objectives are the continuous improvement activities that we must do to implement strategy. The break down the more abstract concepts like mission and vision into actionable steps. Actions that your organization take should be helping you achieve your strategic objectives. Examples might include: Increase Revenue, Improve the Customer or Stakeholder Experience, or Improve the Cost-Effectiveness of Our Programs.


BSC Terminology: Strategy Mapping

One of the most powerful elements in the BSC methodology is the use of strategy mapping to visualize and communicate how value is created by the organization. A strategy map is a simple graphic that shows a logical, cause-and-effect connection between strategic objectives (shown as ovals on the map). Generally speaking, improving performance in the objectives found in the Organizational Capacity perspective (the bottom row) enables the organization to improve its Internal Process perspective (the next row up), which, in turn, enables the organization to create desirable results in the Customer and Financial perspectives (the top two rows).


BSC Terminology: Measures (Key Performance Indicators)

For each objective on the strategy map, at least one measure or Key Performance Indicator (KPI) will be identified and tracked over time. KPI’s indicate progress toward a desirable outcome. Strategic KPIs monitor the implementation and effectiveness of an organization's strategies, determine the gap between actual and targeted performance and determine organization effectiveness and operational efficiency.
Good KPIs:
  • Provide an objective way to see if strategy is working
  • Offer a comparison that gauges the degree of performance change over time
  • Focus employees' attention on what matters most to success
  • Allow measurement of accomplishments, not just of the work that is performed
  • Provide a common language for communication
  • Help reduce intangible uncertainty












BSC Terminology: Cascading

Cascading a balanced scorecard means to translate the corporate-wide scorecard (referred to as Tier 1) down to first business units, support units or departments (Tier 2) and then teams or individuals (Tier 3). The end result should be focus across all levels of the organization that is consistent. The organization alignment should be clearly visible through strategy, using the strategy map, performance measures and targets, and initiatives. Scorecards should be used to improve accountability through objective and performance measure ownership, and desired employee behaviors should be incentivized with recognition and rewards.

Cascading strategy focuses the entire organization on strategy and creating line-of-sight between the work people do and high level desired results. As the management system is cascaded down through the organization, objectives become more operational and tactical, as do the performance measures. Accountability follows the objectives and measures, as ownership is defined at each level. An emphasis on results and the strategies needed to produce results is communicated throughout the organization. This alignment step is critical to becoming a strategy-focused organization.


BSC History


The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) was originally developed by Dr. Robert Kaplan of Harvard University and Dr. David Norton as a framework for measuring organizational performance using a more BALANCED set of performance measures. Traditionally companies used only short-term financial performance as measure of success. The “balanced scorecard” added additional non-financial strategic measures to the mix in order to better focus on long-term success. The system has evolved over the years and is now considered a fully integrated strategic management system.
Adapted from Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System,” Harvard Business Review (January-February 1996): 76.
While the phrase balanced scorecard was coined in the early 1990s, the roots of the this type of approach are deep, and include the pioneering work of General Electric on performance measurement reporting in the 1950’s and the work of French process engineers (who created theTableau de Bord – literally, a "dashboard" of performance measures) in the early part of the 20th century.

This new approach to strategic management was first detailed in a series of articles and books by Drs. Kaplan and Norton and built on work by Art Schneiderman at Analog Devices. Recognizing some of the weaknesses and vagueness of previous management approaches, the balanced scorecard approach provides a clear prescription as to what companies should measure in order to 'balance' the financial perspective.

Kaplan and Norton describe the innovation of the balanced scorecard as follows:

"The balanced scorecard retains traditional financial measures. But financial measures tell the story of past events, an adequate story for industrial age companies for which investments in long-term capabilities and customer relationships were not critical for success. These financial measures are inadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age companies must make to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers, employees, processes, technology, and innovation."


BSC Automation and Performance Analysis

Once a scorecard has been developed and implemented, performance management software can be used to get the right performance information to the right people at the right time. Automation adds structure and discipline to implementing the Balanced Scorecard system, helps transform disparate corporate data into information and knowledge, and helps communicate performance information. The Balanced Scorecard Institute formally recommends the QuickScore Performance Information SystemTM developed by Spider Strategies and co-marketed by the Institute.


BSC Development

The Institute’s award-winning framework, Nine Steps to SuccessTM, is a disciplined, practical approach to developing a strategic planning and management system based on the balanced scorecard. Training is an integral part of the framework, as is coaching, change management, and problem solving. Emphasis is placed on “teaching clients to fish, not handing them a fish”, so the scorecard system can be sustained.

A key benefit of using a disciplined framework is that it gives organizations a way to ‘connect the dots’ between the various components of strategic planning and management, meaning that there will be a visible connection between the projects and programs that people are working on, the measurements being used to track success, the strategic objectives the organization is trying to accomplish and the mission, vision and strategy of the organization.






Monday, 16 April 2018

ACC2233 - International Accounting






What is International Accounting?


international accounting
International accounting is a specialty within the entire discipline that is focused on using specific accounting standards that are as relevant in the US as they are when you are balancing the books of a company overseas. If you are interested in working as an accounting professional and you are trying to choose a specialty or subset, it is important to learn how one differs from the other. In today’s modern business world, any financial accountant who works in the global business environment of the 21st century will fit into the broad definition of international accountant. Read on, and find out more about what global accounting is and why it is a popular choice.


International Accountants Use International Standards

Domestic accountants in the United States still use what some believe are outdated techniques and standards referred to as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The U.S. GAAP standards are used by the Securities Exchange Commission, but eventually there will be a shift to the International Financial Reporting Standards so that all companies can follow the same code of rules and reporting standards when making financial information public, according to Investopedia.

Includes study of various functional areas of accounting
§Focuses on the accounting issues unique to multinational corporations

Can be defined at three different levels
§Supranational accounting
§Standards, guidelines, and rules issued by supranational organizations

§Company level
§Followed by company in international business activities and foreign investments

§International accounting
§Study of the standards, guidelines, and rules of accounting, auditing, and taxation existing within each country and comparison across countries

Saturday, 14 April 2018

BUACC3714 - Kaizen




What Is Kaizen? By Joel Bradbury

As a lean manufacturing tool Kaizen improves quality, productivity, safety, and workplace culture. This occurs by applying small daily changes that yield major improvements over time. Kaizen first surfaced during the effort to rebuild Japan after World War II. Several U.S. business consultants collaborated with Japanese companies to improve manufacturing. The result was the development of several new management techniques, including Kaizen.

Kaizen comes from two Japanese words: Kai (improvement) and Zen (good). Over time, it became known as “continuous improvement.” Unlike many business practices Kaizen’s strength comes from requiring all workers—from the CEO to the shop floor assistant—to contribute suggestions to improve the business.

How Does Lean Kaizen Work?
Kaizen works by reducing waste (muda) and eliminating work processes that are overly difficult (muri). As a lean business practice, Kaizen succeeds when all employees look for areas to improve and provide suggestions based on their observations and experience.

From the beginning, it must be clear that all suggestions are welcome and that there will be no negative consequences for participating. Instead, employees are rewarded for changes that improve the workplace. Workers become more confident and invested in improving the company. They become leaders that continually look for areas that can be improved.

warehouse utilizing Kaizen continuous improvements









Kaizen Idea Board


BUACC3714 - Designing measures for continuous improvement

Assalamualaikum and hi,

Let talk about continuous improvement. There is nothing new actually, it is just that we need to move on and improve. Just like we pray everyday...we always pray that hopefully today will be much better than yesterday. That's simple!

It is simple because we want to do it and we want change.It is quick because we can do it ourselves by having good vision and  planning. It is inexpensive because continuous improvement only need consistency and will to implement it.


here's another



IMPROVING PROCESS AND ELIMINATING WASTE

How to achieve the above? By implementing Kaizen "continuous improvement" the processes can be simplified and quicker. Wastage in terms of time, resources and money can also be eliminated. This is due to everything is being efficient!.



Thursday, 12 April 2018

BUACC3714 - Economic Value Added (EVA)

Assalamualaikum and afternoon,

I took this from Investopedia... Not a girl named EVA but this is a term....so, live with it! Hahaha..


What is 'Economic Value Added - EVA'

Economic value added (EVA) is a measure of a company's financial performance based on the residual wealth calculated by deducting its cost of capital from its operating profit, adjusted for taxes on a cash basis. EVA can also be referred to as economic profit, as it attempts to capture the true economic profit of a company. This measure was devised by management consulting firm Stern Value Management, originally incorporated as Stern Stewart and Co.


BREAKING DOWN 'Economic Value Added - EVA'

EVA is the incremental difference in the rate of return over a company's cost of capital. Essentially, it is used to measure the value a company generates from funds invested into it. If a company's EVA is negative, it means the company is not generating value from the funds invested into the business. Conversely, a positive EVA shows a company is producing value from the funds invested in it.

The formula for calculating EVA is: Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) - Invested Capital * Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)​​​

Components of EVA

The equation for EVA shows that there are three key components to a company's EVA: NOPAT, the amount of capital invested and the WACC. NOPAT can be calculated manually but is normally listed in a public company's financials. Capital invested is the amount of money used to fund a specific project. WACC is the average rate of return a company expects to pay its investors; the weights are derived as a fraction of each financial source in a company's capital structure. WACC can also be calculated but is normally provided as public record.

An equation for invested capital often used to calculate EVA is = Total Assets - Current Liabilities, two figures easily found on a firm's balance sheet. In this case, the formula for EVA is: NOPAT - (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) * WACC.

The goal of EVA is to quantify the charge, or cost, of investing capital into a certain project or firm and to then assess whether it generates enough cash to be considered a good investment. The charge represents the minimum return that investors require to make their investment worthwhile. A positive EVA shows a project is generating returns in excess of the required minimum return.

Benefits and Drawbacks of EVA

EVA assesses the performance of a company and its management through the idea that a business is only profitable when it creates wealth and returns for shareholders, thus requiring performance above a company's cost of capital.

EVA as a performance indicator is very useful. The calculation shows how and where a company created wealth, through the inclusion of balance sheet items. This forces managers to be aware of assets and expenses when making managerial decisions. However, the EVA calculation relies heavily on the amount of invested capital, and is best used for asset-rich companies that are stable or mature. Companies with intangible assets, such as technology businesses, may not be good candidates for an EVA evaluation.

Part 1


Part 2



Part 3



Part 4


Part 5



Read more: Economic Value Added (EVA) https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eva.asp#ixzz5CRDI38sP
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook

ACC2233 - Measurement of the elements of financial statements

and this one...

Measurement is the process of determining the monetary amounts at which the elements of the financial statements are to be recognised and carried in the balance sheet and income statement. This involves the selection of the particular basis of measurement.

A number of different measurement bases are employed to different degrees and in varying combinations in financial statements. They include the following:

  • Historical cost. Assets are recorded at the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of the consideration given to acquire them at the time of their acquisition. Liabilities are recorded at the amount of proceeds received in exchange for the obligation, or in some circumstances (for example, income taxes), at the amounts of cash or cash equivalents expected to be paid to satisfy the liability in the normal course of business. 

  • Current cost. Assets are carried at the amount of cash or cash equivalents that would have to be paid if the same or an equivalent asset was acquired currently. Liabilities are carried at the undiscounted amount of cash or cash equivalents that would be required to settle the obligation currently.

  • Realisable (settlement) value. Assets are carried at the amount of cash or cash equivalents that could currently be obtained by selling the asset in an orderly disposal. Liabilities are carried at their settlement values; that is, the undiscounted amounts of cash or cash equivalents expected to be paid to satisfy the liabilities in the normal course of business.

  • Present value. Assets are carried at the present discounted value of the future net cash inflows that the item is expected to generate in the normal course of business. Liabilities are carried at the present discounted value of the future net cash outflows that are expected to be required to settle the liabilities in the normal course of business.